Judicial activism involves judicial rulings that interpret the law in a way that actively promotes social change or addresses injustices, often going beyond mere application of statutory text. This approach can significantly impact a political system by shaping public policy and influencing governance. While proponents argue that judicial activism protects individual rights and maintains equality, critics contend that it undermines the separation of powers and democratic processes by allowing unelected judges to make sweeping decisions. The implications of judicial activism are profound, as it can lead to shifts in public policy and ongoing debates about the role of the judiciary in a democracy.